H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lukas Rosol vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-2

Marcos Baghdatis holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2015 Stuttgart third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 31, 2018 Doha ATP 250 Q1 Q Hard Marcos Baghdatis #124 6-0 7-6(3) Lukas Rosol #142 Match data
Jun 11, 2015* Stuttgart ATP 250 R32 Grass Marcos Baghdatis #63 6-3 6-4 Lukas Rosol #38 Match data
Jun 14, 2012* Queen's Club ATP 500 R32 Grass Lukas Rosol #101 6-3 4-6 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #42 Match data
Feb 2, 2012* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Hard Marcos Baghdatis #45 4-6 6-3 6-3 Lukas Rosol #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,921 110 148 42.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 324 272 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Rosol Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #159 1,559 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,694 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,535 0 0 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,937 0 2
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,562 0 0 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,815 0 2
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,575 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,810 0 3
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,576 0 0 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,852 0 4
26 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,748 0 0 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2013 21–24 46.7% #47 1,742 0 1 2012 31–24 56.4% #36 1,897 0 4
28 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,798 0 2 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,804 0 4
29 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,846 0 2 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,703 0 4
30 2016 14–22 38.9% #113 1,726 0 2 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,869 0 4
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,671 0 2 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,703 0 2 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,660 0 2 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,723 0 4
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,740 0 4
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2 — — — — — — —