H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Lukas Rosol vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-2

Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2015 Munich Open second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Rosol #41 7-5 6-2 Sergiy Stakhovsky #53 Match data May 1, 2015* R16 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Sergiy Stakhovsky #53 4-6 6-1 6-4 Lukas Rosol #30 Match data Feb 25, 2015* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP 500 Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #59 6-3 6-2 Lukas Rosol #31 Match data Feb 19, 2015* R32 Marseille ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukas Rosol Sergiy Stakhovsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0
22 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4
26 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4
27 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4
28 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4
29 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4
30 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4
31 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4
32 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4
36 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukas Rosol Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
30 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — — — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's and 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukas Rosol Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2% 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6%
22 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6% 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6%
23 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0% 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5%
24 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8% 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6%
25 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2% 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8%
26 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6% 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7%
27 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2% 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6%
28 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8% 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9%
29 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1% 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1%
30 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8% 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7%
31 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4% 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9%
32 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3% 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9%
33 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0% 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9%
34 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8% 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1%
36 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4% — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukas Rosol Sergiy Stakhovsky
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41
21 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11
22 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41
23 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.1 +1.40
24 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) 105.2 -0.67
25 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) 97.7 +0.09 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 +0.79
26 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) 102.8 -1.04 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) 95.4 -1.40
27 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 97.4 +1.39 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 95.4 -0.19
28 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) 107.1 -1.09 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) 102.0 -0.26
29 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) 102.7 -1.23 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 102.1 -0.06
30 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) 101.9 -1.96 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.6 -0.26
31 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 98.6 -0.83
32 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
33 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.0 +0.37 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.66
34 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10
35 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06
36 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41 — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.