H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-2
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 2–1 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2015 Munich fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Lukas Rosol | 7-5 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2015* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2015* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-2 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukas Rosol | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |