H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Lukas Rosol vs Stephane Robert H2H: 0-1
Stephane Robert holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephane Robert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephane Robert won the 2016 Moscow fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Stephane Robert | 7-5 6-1 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 7-5 2-6 7-6(6) | Stephane Robert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stephane Robert | #1,486 | #50 | 926 | 1,839 | 38 | 75 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Rosol | Stephane Robert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #105 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #134 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #208 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #218 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #898 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |