H2H data updated: 2026-10-23 00:00 UTC

Lukasz Kubot vs Chris Guccione

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Lukasz Kubot vs Chris Guccione.

POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukasz Kubot #184 7-6(5) 6-2 Chris Guccione #179 Match data Aug 29, 2005 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chris Guccione #986 #67 926 1,681 36 59 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukasz Kubot Chris Guccione
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–2 50.0% #462 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–2 50.0% #281 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #155 1,586 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–3 25.0% #153 1,543 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 8–15 34.8% #91 1,524 0 0
22 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0 2008 11–18 37.9% #96 1,560 0 0
23 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0 2009 7–8 46.7% #136 1,619 0 0
24 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #376 1,554 0 0
25 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #256 1,584 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #570 1,644 0 0
27 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #520 1,640 0 0
28 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0 2014 0–1 0.0% #980 1,664 0 0
29 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukasz Kubot Chris Guccione
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 29 41 70 41.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's and 94/95 of Chris Guccione's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukasz Kubot Chris Guccione
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 18.0 5.5 59.7% 83.3% 51.5% 76.8% 50.0% 70.5% 33.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 12.0 3.0 55.7% 84.5% 53.8% 74.2% 26.2% 71.2% 28.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 12.8 4.5 58.1% 76.4% 54.5% 33.9% 17.5% 67.3% 32.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 19.8 4.8 59.3% 76.5% 44.7% 58.0% 41.7% 63.5% 26.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/23 15.7 3.6 58.3% 78.3% 53.8% 65.4% 26.3% 68.0% 28.5%
22 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0% 2008 28/29 14.9 2.6 62.0% 79.7% 52.6% 72.1% 36.1% 69.4% 26.6%
23 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5% 2009 15/15 13.7 3.4 59.7% 79.1% 49.9% 67.5% 36.4% 67.8% 29.2%
24 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8% 2010 2/2 12.5 1.0 63.6% 74.2% 59.8% 65.0% 0.0% 69.6% 19.6%
25 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3% 2011 4/4 13.0 3.5 60.3% 80.8% 46.3% 82.6% 56.3% 67.3% 30.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 7.0 6.0 53.9% 68.8% 43.9% 20.0% 40.0% 57.3% 33.3%
27 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1% 2013 2/2 8.5 2.0 72.0% 90.6% 51.5% 50.0% 54.2% 79.0% 45.8%
28 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0% 2014 1/1 13.0 1.0 64.7% 81.8% 41.7% 66.7% 0.0% 67.6% 18.0%
29 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.1% 41.8% 60.1% 36.3% — 94/95 14.6 3.3 60.1% 79.3% 51.9% 66.6% 33.0% 68.5% 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukasz Kubot Chris Guccione
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1483 106.2 +0.35 -0.92 1.125 52.1% — — — 60.0% +0.50 0–2 4–1 (80%) — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 116.2 +1.58 -2.45 0.978 50.0% +18 — — 50.0% +0.10 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1586 111.9 +2.37 -2.26 0.985 48.7% — — +20 42.1% -0.63 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.5 -0.21
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1543 108.6 +0.30 -2.26 0.719 46.7% -25 — — 20.0% -0.90 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.30
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1525 119.6 +2.74 -5.40 0.891 48.7% +37 -14 +27 40.3% -0.56 3–6 (33%) 11–11 (50%) 98.9 +0.16
22 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09 2008 1560 127.5 +4.75 -7.05 0.870 48.4% +42 — -45 39.2% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 14–12 (54%) 104.4 0.00
23 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11 2009 1619 133.1 +3.06 -3.98 0.906 49.1% +72 — — 47.2% -0.31 1–1 6–7 (46%) — +0.12
24 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02 2010 1554 99.5 +0.96 -3.80 0.646 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
25 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02 2011 1585 114.2 +0.83 -1.90 0.916 49.0% +83 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
26 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1645 118.7 -1.04 -2.78 0.781 46.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.03
27 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34 2013 1640 108.4 0.00 +0.05 2.183 61.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.18
28 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09 2014 1665 108.1 +3.55 -2.62 0.557 44.2% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.14
29 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47 2015 1605 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69 — 1682 125.4 +2.90 -4.66 0.907 48.9% +44 -14 +1 40.6% -0.54 11–19 (37%) 41–41 (50%) 100.6 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.