H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Lukasz Kubot vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1

Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 2007 Japan Open first round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Justin Gimelstob #667 6-4 7-5 Lukasz Kubot #181 Match data Oct 3, 2007* R64 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lukasz Kubot Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lukasz Kubot Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lukasz Kubot Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0% 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5% 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8% 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3% 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lukasz Kubot Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.34 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) 92.0 +0.09 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) 109.1 +0.47 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) 99.9 +0.63 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 96.6 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) 95.1 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.