H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Lukasz Kubot vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 0-1
Justin Gimelstob holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Justin Gimelstob won the 2007 Tokyo second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2007* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 6-4 7-5 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukasz Kubot | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |