H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lukasz Kubot vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2013 Wimbledon second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | (w/o) | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lukasz Kubot | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |