H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Edmondson vs C. Drysdale H2H: 1-1
M. Edmondson and C. Drysdale are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, M. Edmondson leads 1–0 on clay, while C. Drysdale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, M. Edmondson won the 1979 Tokyo Outdoor third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 85
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1979* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | M. Edmondson | 6-3 6-4 | C. Drysdale | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1977* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | C. Drysdale | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | M. Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| C. Drysdale | #423 | #13 | 0 | 2,134 | 402 | 253 | 61.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Edmondson | C. Drysdale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 | 1968 | 53–37 | 58.9% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 | 1969 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 | 1970 | 45–25 | 64.3% | — | 1,908 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 | 1971 | 76–29 | 72.4% | — | 1,997 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 | 1972 | 51–29 | 63.8% | — | 1,935 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 | 1973 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #23 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 | 1974 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #36 | 1,827 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #47 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #217 | 1,710 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #423 | 1,707 | 0 | 8 |