H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Ruah vs D. Rostagno H2H: 1-0
M. Ruah holds a 1–0 lead over D. Rostagno in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, M. Ruah leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, M. Ruah won the 1992 Scottsdale third round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
VEN
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1992* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | M. Ruah | 7-6(4) 6-4 | D. Rostagno | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Ruah | #1,345 | #90 | 479 | 1,577 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D. Rostagno | #1,316 | #13 | 1,392 | 1,920 | 192 | 180 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Ruah | D. Rostagno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #418 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #428 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #89 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #13 | 1,889 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #177 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #111 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #486 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |