H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Mackenzie McDonald vs Denis Istomin H2H: 0-1
Denis Istomin holds a 1–0 lead over Mackenzie McDonald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denis Istomin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2019 New York third round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2019* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2017* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Mackenzie McDonald | 6-4 6-2 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie McDonald | #140 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,868 | 113 | 146 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mackenzie McDonald | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #673 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |