H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mackenzie McDonald vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-1
Kyle Edmund holds a 1–0 lead over Mackenzie McDonald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kyle Edmund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2018 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2018* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 6-2 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie McDonald | #140 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,868 | 113 | 146 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mackenzie McDonald | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #673 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |