H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Mackenzie McDonald vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 2-1
Mackenzie McDonald holds a 2–1 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay, while Mackenzie McDonald leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mackenzie McDonald won the 2023 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2023* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mackenzie McDonald | 6-3 6-3 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| May 12, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-3 7-5 | Mackenzie McDonald | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mackenzie McDonald | 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie McDonald | #140 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,868 | 113 | 146 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mackenzie McDonald | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #673 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |