H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Mackenzie McDonald vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 0-1

Rajeev Ram holds a 1–0 lead over Mackenzie McDonald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rajeev Ram leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rajeev Ram won the 2016 Newport round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mackenzie McDonald
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rajeev Ram #69 6-2 6-3 Mackenzie McDonald #419 Match data Jul 14, 2016* R32 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mackenzie McDonald #146 #37 1,146 1,869 113 148 43.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mackenzie McDonald Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2013 0–1 0.0% — 1,532 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2016 0–3 0.0% #321 1,452 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2018 9–13 40.9% #78 1,693 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2019 10–12 45.5% #129 1,716 0 0 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2020 4–8 33.3% #193 1,684 0 0 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2021 18–19 48.6% #55 1,789 0 0 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2022 26–28 48.1% #63 1,721 0 0 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2023 31–27 53.4% #41 1,831 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2024 4–13 23.5% #131 1,673 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2025 9–18 33.3% #114 1,644 0 0 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2026 2–6 25.0% #146 1,580 0 0 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mackenzie McDonald Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2018 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2019 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2020 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
26 2021 16 16 32 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2022 20 20 40 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2023 25 17 42 59.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2024 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2025 6 13 19 31.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2026 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 84 104 188 44.7% 10 24 34 29.4% 19 20 39 48.7% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/261 of Mackenzie McDonald's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mackenzie McDonald Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 1/1 1.0 5.0 65.5% 58.3% 15.8% 61.5% 0.0% 43.6% 18.9% 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2016 3/3 1.7 2.0 56.7% 59.6% 41.4% 39.8% 26.1% 50.8% 37.4% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2018 22/22 5.0 4.0 64.3% 70.1% 51.2% 65.1% 37.9% 63.2% 33.7% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2019 22/22 4.4 2.5 62.0% 67.5% 52.1% 63.5% 47.9% 61.6% 35.4% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2020 12/12 5.1 2.3 64.7% 66.4% 50.1% 45.0% 42.7% 60.4% 37.0% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2021 36/37 6.4 2.3 64.3% 70.7% 52.1% 60.0% 38.8% 64.0% 36.4% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2022 54/54 5.3 2.1 65.1% 69.2% 50.7% 57.6% 44.4% 62.7% 37.8% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2023 58/58 4.8 2.3 63.2% 71.0% 50.8% 60.0% 44.3% 63.7% 38.7% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2024 17/17 3.8 3.2 65.3% 65.6% 47.3% 49.7% 52.0% 59.3% 37.4% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2025 25/27 5.8 2.5 65.6% 68.8% 51.2% 51.4% 42.0% 62.8% 33.1% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2026 8/8 3.4 2.4 61.5% 60.6% 51.4% 61.9% 29.4% 57.1% 34.6% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
Career — 258/261 5.1 2.5 64.0% 68.9% 50.6% 57.9% 42.7% 62.3% 36.6% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mackenzie McDonald Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1533 107.8 -0.51 -5.05 0.336 33.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 2014 1508 96.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2015 1514 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2016 1453 99.0 -3.67 -0.14 0.761 43.6% — — — 22.2% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.39 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2017 1494 112.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2018 1693 138.9 -0.75 -0.63 0.915 48.6% -67 — +44 46.9% -0.33 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) — -0.67 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2019 1716 136.7 -1.42 -0.44 0.921 48.6% +31 -201 — 45.8% -0.63 5–4 (56%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.96 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2020 1685 130.1 -2.02 +0.42 0.934 48.6% -3 — — 41.7% -0.61 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2021 1790 150.3 +0.66 +0.11 1.010 49.9% +3 -112 — 51.5% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.28 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2022 1722 146.9 -0.59 +0.89 1.013 50.5% +22 -38 +30 51.4% +0.14 6–13 (32%) 12–13 (48%) — +0.01 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2023 1831 151.2 -0.07 +2.04 1.066 50.8% +40 -249 -65 51.9% +0.16 7–8 (47%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.17 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2024 1673 119.4 -4.03 +1.35 0.918 48.0% +52 -139 +35 34.7% -0.80 2–5 (29%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.82 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2025 1645 131.5 -0.75 -1.95 0.890 48.2% +9 -139 +82 38.4% -0.73 6–9 (40%) 4–10 (29%) — -2.31 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 2026 1580 117.4 -2.40 -0.49 0.808 46.8% +41 — — 26.3% -1.32 — — — -0.23 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1869 144.1 -0.78 +0.45 0.971 49.4% +16 -145 +12 46.3% -0.27 32–58 (36%) 47–55 (46%) 89.5 -2.48 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.