H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Mackenzie McDonald vs Thijs Boogaard.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie McDonald | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Thijs Boogaard | Match data | Jun 9, 2025* | Q2 | Libéma Open | ATP 250 | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackenzie McDonald | #146 | #37 | 1,146 | 1,869 | 113 | 148 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thijs Boogaard | #493 | #481 | 92 | 1,512 | 1 | 2 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mackenzie McDonald | Thijs Boogaard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #493 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #78 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #129 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #131 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mackenzie McDonald | Thijs Boogaard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1492 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1484 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1510 | 110.4 | +0.93 | -0.91 | 0.850 | 48.0% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.16 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1533 | 107.8 | -0.51 | -5.05 | 0.336 | 33.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 1508 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1514 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 1453 | 99.0 | -3.67 | -0.14 | 0.761 | 43.6% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 1494 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 1693 | 138.9 | -0.75 | -0.63 | 0.915 | 48.6% | -67 | — | +44 | 46.9% | -0.33 | 2–7 (22%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 1716 | 136.7 | -1.42 | -0.44 | 0.921 | 48.6% | +31 | -201 | — | 45.8% | -0.63 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 1685 | 130.1 | -2.02 | +0.42 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -3 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.61 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 1790 | 150.3 | +0.66 | +0.11 | 1.010 | 49.9% | +3 | -112 | — | 51.5% | +0.02 | 3–7 (30%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 1722 | 146.9 | -0.59 | +0.89 | 1.013 | 50.5% | +22 | -38 | +30 | 51.4% | +0.14 | 6–13 (32%) | 12–13 (48%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 1831 | 151.2 | -0.07 | +2.04 | 1.066 | 50.8% | +40 | -249 | -65 | 51.9% | +0.16 | 7–8 (47%) | 10–12 (45%) | — | -1.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 1673 | 119.4 | -4.03 | +1.35 | 0.918 | 48.0% | +52 | -139 | +35 | 34.7% | -0.80 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1645 | 131.5 | -0.75 | -1.95 | 0.890 | 48.2% | +9 | -139 | +82 | 38.4% | -0.73 | 6–9 (40%) | 4–10 (29%) | — | -2.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1580 | 117.4 | -2.40 | -0.45 | 0.808 | 46.8% | +42 | — | — | 26.3% | -1.32 | — | — | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1869 | 144.1 | -0.78 | +0.45 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +16 | -145 | +12 | 46.3% | -0.27 | 32–58 (36%) | 47–55 (46%) | 89.5 | -2.48 | — | 1512 | 105.5 | +0.93 | -0.91 | 0.850 | 48.0% | — | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -5.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoshihito Nishioka | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Karen Khachanov | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jul 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Ilya Ivashka | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jun 15, 2023 | H2H |
| Brandon Nakashima | 4 | 1 | 5 | Apr 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Yibing Wu | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jun 10, 2026 | H2H |
| Stan Wawrinka | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 11, 2026 | H2H |