H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Gustafsson vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 3-1
Magnus Gustafsson holds a 3–1 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magnus Gustafsson leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1992 Indian Wells Masters second round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magnus Gustafsson | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1991* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-4 6-1 | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1991* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Magnus Gustafsson | 7-6(1) 6-3 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
| Feb 16, 1990* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Magnus Gustafsson | 6-4 6-4 | Amos Mansdorf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | #681 | #10 | 2,141 | 2,012 | 394 | 252 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Gustafsson | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #53 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #51 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1991 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #47 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1993 | 50–29 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1994 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #33 | 1,857 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,732 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1996 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1997 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #37 | 1,830 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1999 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,802 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2000 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #82 | 1,718 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2001 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,695 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |