H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Gustafsson vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 1-1
Magnus Gustafsson and Andrei Cherkasov are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrei Cherkasov won the 1992 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1992* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Andrei Cherkasov | 6-3 6-3 | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
| May 9, 1991* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Gustafsson | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Andrei Cherkasov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | #681 | #10 | 2,141 | 2,012 | 394 | 252 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Andrei Cherkasov | #1,174 | #13 | 1,320 | 1,897 | 170 | 198 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Gustafsson | Andrei Cherkasov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #82 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #53 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #21 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #51 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–27 | 22.9% | #172 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #47 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,463 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1993 | 50–29 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1994 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #33 | 1,857 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,462 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,732 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,483 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1996 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,452 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1997 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #37 | 1,830 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1999 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,802 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2000 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #82 | 1,718 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2001 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,695 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |