H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 2-4

Andrei Chesnokov holds a 4–2 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Andrei Chesnokov leads 3–1 on clay, while Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Chesnokov won the 1993 Prague semifinal 7-5 2-0 RET.

SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1993* Prague ATP 250 SF Clay Andrei Chesnokov #31 7-5 2-0 (ret.) Magnus Gustafsson #24 Match data
Jul 30, 1993* Hilversum ATP 250 R16 Clay Magnus Gustafsson #26 6-2 4-6 6-2 Andrei Chesnokov #29 Match data
Apr 23, 1992* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #31 7-6(5) 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #11 Match data
Feb 22, 1991* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Magnus Gustafsson #33 4-6 6-3 6-3 Andrei Chesnokov #12 Match data
Aug 30, 1989* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Andrei Chesnokov #18 3-6 6-1 7-5 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #56 Match data
May 5, 1989* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Andrei Chesnokov #30 7-6 6-1 Magnus Gustafsson #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Andrei Chesnokov #709 #9 1,399 1,972 316 235 57.4% 0 2 0 0 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Andrei Chesnokov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #137 1,546 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1986 13–9 59.1% #36 1,733 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1987 24–16 60.0% #52 1,802 0 1
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1988 44–16 73.3% #14 1,884 0 2
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1989 30–16 65.2% #22 1,863 0 4
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1990 43–20 68.3% #12 1,861 0 6
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1991 28–21 57.1% #31 1,781 0 7
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1992 28–27 50.9% #30 1,726 0 7
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7 1993 37–28 56.9% #27 1,749 0 7
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7 1994 37–29 56.1% #32 1,773 0 7
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9 1995 14–22 38.9% #89 1,628 0 7
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10 1996 11–20 35.5% #85 1,585 0 7
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 1997 2–4 33.3% #209 1,571 0 7
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13 1998 2–3 40.0% #494 1,565 0 7
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14 1999 0–1 0.0% #872 1,551 0 7
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14