H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Gustafsson vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 3-1
Magnus Gustafsson holds a 3–1 lead over Bohdan Ulihrach in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1999 Amsterdam third round 2-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1999* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Gustafsson | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1998* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Gustafsson | 6-4 6-4 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1997* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1996* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Magnus Gustafsson | 6-2 6-4 | Bohdan Ulihrach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | #681 | #10 | 2,141 | 2,012 | 394 | 252 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Gustafsson | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #53 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #51 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1991 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #47 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 50–29 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #33 | 1,857 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,732 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1996 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1997 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #37 | 1,830 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1999 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,802 | 0 | 13 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2000 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #82 | 1,718 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2001 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,695 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |