H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-2

Magnus Gustafsson and Cedric Pioline are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Antwerp third round 6-4 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 1998* Antwerp ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #18 6-4 7-6(6) Magnus Gustafsson #36 Match data
May 7, 1997* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Magnus Gustafsson #37 6-4 1-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #31 Match data
Nov 1, 1995* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Cedric Pioline #50 6-2 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #86 Match data
Aug 27, 1992* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Gustafsson #58 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14 — — — — — — —