H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs David Engel H2H: 1-1

Magnus Gustafsson and David Engel are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on clay, while David Engel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Engel won the 1992 Indianapolis third round 6-2 4-6 6-1.

SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
SWE Age 58 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1992 Indianapolis ATP 250 R32 Hard David Engel #164 6-2 4-6 6-1 Magnus Gustafsson #59 Match data
May 8, 1991* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Magnus Gustafsson #21 6-4 6-2 David Engel #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
David Engel #854 #114 312 1,597 24 48 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson David Engel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1985 0–1 0.0% #596 1,483 0 0
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1987 0–2 0.0% #313 1,460 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #274 1,436 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1989 1–5 16.7% #177 1,422 0 0
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1990 10–13 43.5% #117 1,519 0 0
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1991 6–11 35.3% #149 1,551 0 0
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1992 4–6 40.0% #211 1,573 0 0
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1993 1–2 33.3% #151 1,580 0 0
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1994 1–3 25.0% #234 1,554 0 0
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7 1995 0–1 0.0% #844 1,538 0 0
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14