H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs David Rikl H2H: 1-0

Magnus Gustafsson holds a 1–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1997 China Open round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
David Rikl
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Gustafsson #46 6-2 6-4 David Rikl #186 Match data Oct 3, 1997* R16 China Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,013 396 254 60.9% 0 0 0 2 12 14
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,687 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,585 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,807 0 0 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,531 0 0
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,840 0 0 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,536 0 0
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,948 0 3 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,534 0 0
25 1992 27–21 56.2% #47 1,778 0 4 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,892 0 5 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,859 0 7 — — — — — — —
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,734 0 7 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,564 0 0
29 1996 37–17 68.5% #17 1,891 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,829 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,800 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Gustafsson David Rikl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1989 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% 1994 7 14 21 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 36 8 44 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1992 6 7 13 46.2% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 7 15 22 31.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 38 15 53 71.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 1994 14 2 16 87.5% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 16 5 21 76.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 10 9 19 52.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 73 161 54.7% 198 109 307 64.5% 18 18 36 50.0% 92 54 146 63.0% — 13 32 45 28.9% 32 46 78 41.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/514 of Magnus Gustafsson's and 129/142 of David Rikl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Gustafsson David Rikl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/4 2.0 4.5 58.4% 69.4% 48.3% 66.3% 33.3% 60.9% 31.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 11/12 1.5 3.7 55.8% 61.4% 43.4% 57.2% 40.8% 53.2% 40.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 18/20 1.8 3.6 56.0% 64.5% 45.1% 51.7% 47.0% 56.1% 36.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 43/47 2.8 3.8 56.8% 64.9% 49.0% 55.1% 40.8% 58.2% 35.4%
24 1991 56/64 1.9 2.8 68.4% 65.4% 51.7% 53.5% 49.8% 60.9% 44.8% 1995 20/20 3.8 4.4 53.3% 67.9% 49.0% 55.8% 44.4% 59.4% 39.0%
25 1992 45/48 1.8 2.8 67.5% 67.7% 47.9% 60.6% 39.4% 61.4% 40.9% 1996 27/31 2.1 3.3 58.8% 64.2% 45.1% 56.8% 40.0% 56.5% 36.7%
26 1993 71/79 1.7 2.3 70.1% 67.0% 49.8% 59.8% 43.1% 62.1% 41.6% 1997 7/7 5.4 5.9 55.2% 67.9% 44.5% 60.4% 56.0% 57.4% 39.2%
27 1994 33/37 1.8 4.2 64.6% 67.4% 52.9% 54.1% 49.3% 62.2% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 20/22 2.4 3.9 62.4% 65.9% 48.8% 49.0% 54.4% 59.8% 43.8% 1999 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.4% 82.1% 50.0% 33.3% 66.7% 67.1% 34.9%
29 1996 47/54 3.4 3.4 62.9% 68.9% 51.5% 54.5% 48.2% 62.6% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 40/44 4.1 4.8 62.2% 69.5% 48.5% 62.6% 45.2% 61.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 51/58 3.0 3.8 62.7% 71.8% 54.3% 60.3% 46.0% 65.4% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 34/40 4.0 4.1 62.6% 71.5% 49.7% 57.8% 47.5% 63.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 24/31 4.1 4.1 62.6% 70.0% 52.1% 62.9% 32.1% 63.1% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 31/37 3.4 3.5 61.6% 68.1% 46.7% 56.1% 43.0% 59.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/650 2.7 3.4 65.1% 68.4% 50.5% 57.7% 45.3% 62.2% 41.8% — 129/145 2.7 3.9 56.4% 65.2% 46.9% 55.6% 43.0% 57.4% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Gustafsson David Rikl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1504 102.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — +0.28
19 1986 1479 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.07 1990 1492 101.9 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
20 1987 1585 136.3 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.80 1991 1474 99.3 -0.87 -1.37 0.804 47.8% +55 — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.56
21 1988 1711 136.3 — — — — -69 -22 -159 57.0% +0.35 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.55 1992 1503 110.9 -3.14 -0.80 0.856 47.2% — +80 — 41.4% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — +0.71
22 1989 1808 142.7 — — — — -23 -102 — 53.2% -0.01 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.65 1993 1532 121.2 -2.57 -0.92 0.837 46.7% -53 +80 — 37.0% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.11
23 1990 1840 149.5 — — — — -49 +14 — 55.6% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 10–10 (50%) — +0.25 1994 1536 126.2 -2.08 -2.48 0.847 47.1% -44 +135 — 38.9% -0.83 5–8 (38%) 5–12 (29%) — +0.69
24 1991 1949 159.0 +0.58 +5.54 1.147 52.8% -132 +89 — 63.8% +0.92 16–6 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — -3.91 1995 1534 123.3 -1.30 -0.19 0.959 49.3% -48 +102 — 42.0% -0.48 1–5 (17%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78
25 1992 1779 142.7 +0.62 +1.82 1.059 51.0% -45 +128 — 53.3% +0.38 12–3 (80%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.22 1996 1529 123.0 -3.53 -0.97 0.843 46.6% -13 +41 — 39.0% -0.89 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.07
26 1993 1893 150.4 +1.06 +2.75 1.097 51.7% -102 +32 — 59.5% +0.62 15–10 (60%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.12 1997 1578 115.2 -1.18 +1.34 0.921 48.9% -56 — +29 50.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.27
27 1994 1859 150.9 +1.06 +5.93 1.223 53.7% +38 +2 — 63.9% +1.13 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1734 129.3 -0.71 +2.58 1.088 51.6% +88 +66 — 52.7% +0.38 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 1999 1565 98.3 -0.24 +1.75 1.063 50.0% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.03
29 1996 1892 151.9 +0.89 +4.77 1.158 52.8% +3 -36 -192 63.8% +1.00 8–7 (53%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 1830 140.1 +0.02 +2.59 1.074 51.1% +63 -24 -144 55.0% +0.47 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) — +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 1875 153.3 +3.32 +3.75 1.200 52.8% +18 -54 -154 58.3% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 1801 139.9 +1.18 -0.49 1.035 50.3% +85 -46 — 51.0% +0.04 11–7 (61%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 1719 125.4 +0.22 -0.31 1.004 49.9% +111 +38 -59 55.8% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 1695 134.2 -1.00 +1.31 0.973 49.5% +89 +43 -79 48.4% -0.09 8–6 (57%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2014 152.4 +0.85 +3.03 1.105 51.7% -4 +23 -128 57.1% +0.52 127–86 (60%) 103–100 (51%) 102.0 -1.50 — 1687 125.9 -2.34 -1.19 0.867 47.4% -37 +85 +29 39.5% -0.81 15–30 (33%) 19–25 (43%) 91.8 +2.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.