H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Eric Jelen H2H: 1-2

Eric Jelen holds a 2–1 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eric Jelen leads 2–0 on carpet, while Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eric Jelen won the 1989 Milan third round 6-4 6-2.

SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
GER Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 16, 1989* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Eric Jelen #68 6-4 6-2 Magnus Gustafsson #43 Match data
Feb 10, 1989* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Eric Jelen #75 6-3 6-2 Magnus Gustafsson #43 Match data
Nov 6, 1987* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Magnus Gustafsson #106 7-6 6-2 Eric Jelen #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Eric Jelen #1,153 #23 575 1,805 124 127 49.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Eric Jelen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1983 2–3 40.0% #450 1,507 0 0
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1984 5–9 35.7% #168 1,502 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1985 2–3 40.0% #172 1,508 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1986 17–15 53.1% #31 1,688 0 0
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1987 22–19 53.7% #40 1,748 0 0
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1988 18–17 51.4% #76 1,700 0 0
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1989 22–14 61.1% #47 1,727 0 1
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1990 23–23 50.0% #68 1,707 0 1
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1991 13–24 35.1% #118 1,613 0 1
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14