H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-1

Magnus Gustafsson and Jacco Eltingh are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1993 Beijing third round 7-5 6-4.

SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 1993* Beijing ATP 250 R32 Carpet Magnus Gustafsson #19 7-5 6-4 Jacco Eltingh #59 Match data
Jul 24, 1992* Hilversum ATP 250 R16 Clay Jacco Eltingh #93 4-6 6-4 7-6(5) Magnus Gustafsson #35 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Jacco Eltingh #1,378 #19 1,332 1,874 124 140 47.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Jacco Eltingh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1989 0–1 0.0% #276 1,490 0 0
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1990 3–2 60.0% #128 1,525 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1991 12–24 33.3% #114 1,510 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1992 18–22 45.0% #78 1,590 0 1
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1993 22–26 45.8% #63 1,633 0 2
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1994 40–23 63.5% #23 1,828 0 4
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1995 24–26 48.0% #43 1,771 0 4
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1996 4–11 26.7% #307 1,634 0 4
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1997 1–5 16.7% #604 1,568 0 4
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14