H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 0-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1992 US Open round of 128 7-5 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jakob Hlasek #28 7-5 6-3 6-3 Magnus Gustafsson #57 Match data Sep 2, 1992* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,013 396 254 60.9% 0 0 0 2 12 14
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,585 0 0 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,807 0 0 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,840 0 0 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,948 0 3 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1992 27–21 56.2% #47 1,778 0 4 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,892 0 5 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,859 0 7 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,734 0 7 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 1996 37–17 68.5% #17 1,891 0 9 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,829 0 10 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,800 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Jakob Hlasek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
22 1989 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3%
24 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 36 8 44 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
25 1992 6 7 13 46.2% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 38 15 53 71.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3%
27 1994 14 2 16 87.5% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 16 5 21 76.2% 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
30 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
31 1998 10 9 19 52.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
32 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 73 161 54.7% 198 109 307 64.5% 18 18 36 50.0% 92 54 146 63.0% — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/514 of Magnus Gustafsson's and 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Jakob Hlasek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 1991 56/64 1.9 2.8 68.4% 65.4% 51.7% 53.5% 49.8% 60.9% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1992 45/48 1.8 2.8 67.5% 67.7% 47.9% 60.6% 39.4% 61.4% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1993 71/79 1.7 2.3 70.1% 67.0% 49.8% 59.8% 43.1% 62.1% 41.6% 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0%
27 1994 33/37 1.8 4.2 64.6% 67.4% 52.9% 54.1% 49.3% 62.2% 46.2% 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2%
28 1995 20/22 2.4 3.9 62.4% 65.9% 48.8% 49.0% 54.4% 59.8% 43.8% 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3%
29 1996 47/54 3.4 3.4 62.9% 68.9% 51.5% 54.5% 48.2% 62.6% 43.2% 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8%
30 1997 40/44 4.1 4.8 62.2% 69.5% 48.5% 62.6% 45.2% 61.8% 41.1% 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4%
31 1998 51/58 3.0 3.8 62.7% 71.8% 54.3% 60.3% 46.0% 65.4% 41.6% 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1%
32 1999 34/40 4.0 4.1 62.6% 71.5% 49.7% 57.8% 47.5% 63.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 24/31 4.1 4.1 62.6% 70.0% 52.1% 62.9% 32.1% 63.1% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 31/37 3.4 3.5 61.6% 68.1% 46.7% 56.1% 43.0% 59.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/650 2.7 3.4 65.1% 68.4% 50.5% 57.7% 45.3% 62.2% 41.8% — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Jakob Hlasek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84
19 1986 1479 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.07 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04
20 1987 1585 136.3 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.80 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17
21 1988 1711 136.3 — — — — -69 -22 -159 57.0% +0.35 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -0.55 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10
22 1989 1808 142.7 — — — — -23 -102 — 53.2% -0.01 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -1.65 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72
23 1990 1840 149.5 — — — — -49 +14 — 55.6% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 10–10 (50%) 106.6 +0.25 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83
24 1991 1949 159.0 +0.58 +5.54 1.147 52.8% -132 +89 — 63.8% +0.92 16–6 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 105.6 -3.91 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85
25 1992 1779 142.7 +0.62 +1.82 1.059 51.0% -45 +128 — 53.3% +0.38 12–3 (80%) 5–6 (45%) 104.2 -0.22 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05
26 1993 1893 150.4 +1.06 +2.75 1.097 51.7% -102 +32 — 59.5% +0.62 15–10 (60%) 14–12 (54%) 101.9 +0.12 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58
27 1994 1859 150.9 +1.06 +5.93 1.223 53.7% +38 +2 — 63.9% +1.13 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.24 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64
28 1995 1734 129.3 -0.71 +2.58 1.088 51.6% +88 +66 — 52.7% +0.38 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.1 +0.26 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57
29 1996 1892 151.9 +0.89 +4.77 1.158 52.8% +3 -36 -192 63.8% +1.00 8–7 (53%) 14–12 (54%) 102.1 -1.57 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32
30 1997 1830 140.1 +0.02 +2.59 1.074 51.1% +63 -24 -144 55.0% +0.47 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) 96.2 +1.51 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57
31 1998 1875 153.3 +3.32 +3.75 1.200 52.8% +18 -54 -154 58.3% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -3.20 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84
32 1999 1801 139.9 +1.18 -0.49 1.035 50.3% +85 -46 — 51.0% +0.04 11–7 (61%) 5–9 (36%) 97.1 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 1719 125.4 +0.22 -0.31 1.004 49.9% +111 +38 -59 55.8% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.7 +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 1695 134.2 -1.00 +1.31 0.973 49.5% +89 +43 -79 48.4% -0.09 8–6 (57%) 8–4 (67%) 103.8 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2014 152.4 +0.85 +3.03 1.105 51.7% -4 +23 -128 57.1% +0.52 127–86 (60%) 103–100 (51%) 102.0 -1.50 — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.