H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Jim Courier H2H: 1-2

Jim Courier holds a 2–1 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1997 Beijing final 7-6(10) 3-6 6-3.

SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 1997* Beijing ATP 250 F Hard Jim Courier #24 7-6(10) 3-6 6-3 Magnus Gustafsson #47 Match data
Nov 4, 1993* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Magnus Gustafsson #20 6-4 6-3 Jim Courier #2 Match data
Oct 6, 1989* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Jim Courier #35 6-3 7-6 Magnus Gustafsson #85 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Jim Courier #728 #1 3,973 2,218 487 222 68.7% 4 5 0 0 14 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Jim Courier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1987 0–2 0.0% #346 1,483 0 0
17 1988 21–15 58.3% #43 1,712 0 0
18 1989 30–18 62.5% #24 1,880 0 1
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1990 39–21 65.0% #25 1,861 0 1
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1991 57–17 77.0% #2 2,047 1 4
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1992 66–15 81.5% #1 2,086 3 9
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1993 58–17 77.3% #3 1,959 4 14
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1994 43–19 69.4% #13 1,888 4 14
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1995 59–20 74.7% #8 1,988 4 18
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1996 28–17 62.2% #26 1,848 4 19
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1997 34–19 64.2% #21 1,827 4 22
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7 1998 19–17 52.8% #77 1,738 4 23
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7 1999 29–20 59.2% #32 1,795 4 23
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9 2000 4–5 44.4% #290 1,737 4 23
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14