H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Magnus Gustafsson vs Mikhail Youzhny H2H: 0-1
Mikhail Youzhny holds a 1–0 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikhail Youzhny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikhail Youzhny won the 2001 Copenhagen quarterfinal 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2001* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mikhail Youzhny | 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(2) | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | #681 | #10 | 2,141 | 2,012 | 394 | 252 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Mikhail Youzhny | #115 | #8 | 3,500 | 2,069 | 477 | 405 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Gustafsson | Mikhail Youzhny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #58 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #53 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #32 | 1,866 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #51 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #43 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #16 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1991 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #24 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #47 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,880 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 50–29 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1994 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #33 | 1,857 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,960 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,732 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1996 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1997 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #37 | 1,830 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | 2013 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #15 | 2,016 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1999 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,802 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #48 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 2000 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #82 | 1,718 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 9–24 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,701 | 0 | 10 |
| 34 | 2001 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,695 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #57 | 1,774 | 0 | 10 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #115 | 1,637 | 0 | 10 |