H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 0-2

Richard Krajicek holds a 2–0 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-1.

SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Richard Krajicek #13 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-1 Magnus Gustafsson #35 Match data
Jul 18, 1991* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Richard Krajicek #42 7-6(2) 5-7 7-6(0) Magnus Gustafsson #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,044 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,745 0 1
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,950 0 3
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,888 0 4
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,883 0 7
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,832 0 9
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,876 1 10
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,969 1 13
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,975 1 15
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,879 1 17
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,885 1 17
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,839 1 17
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,762 1 17
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14