H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Thomas Muster H2H: 1-6

Thomas Muster holds a 6–1 lead over Magnus Gustafsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 5–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1994 Monte Carlo Masters fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 6
7 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 23, 1994* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #12 6-2 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #11 Match data
Jun 20, 1993* Genova ATP 250 F Clay Thomas Muster #15 7-6(3) 6-4 Magnus Gustafsson #37 Match data
Jun 13, 1992* Florence ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #19 6-4 7-5 Magnus Gustafsson #36 Match data
Aug 2, 1991* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R16 Clay Magnus Gustafsson #10 7-5 2-6 6-3 Thomas Muster #58 Match data
May 4, 1990* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #19 7-5 6-2 Magnus Gustafsson #22 Match data
Jan 25, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Thomas Muster #15 6-3 6-2 7-5 Magnus Gustafsson #49 Match data
Sep 17, 1988* Barcelona ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #21 6-1 3-6 6-3 Magnus Gustafsson #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,012 394 252 61.0% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,586 0 0 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,804 0 0 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,825 0 0 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,947 0 3 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 1992 26–20 56.5% #47 1,787 0 4 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,891 0 5 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,857 0 7 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,732 0 7 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 1996 36–16 69.2% #17 1,899 0 9 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,830 0 10 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,802 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14 — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44