H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Magnus Gustafsson vs Udo Riglewski H2H: 2-0

Magnus Gustafsson holds a 2–0 lead over Udo Riglewski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Gustafsson leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1991 Munich Open quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Gustafsson
SWE Age 59 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Udo Riglewski
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Gustafsson #32 6-2 7-5 Udo Riglewski #108 Match data May 4, 1991* QF Munich Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Magnus Gustafsson #34 4-6 6-2 6-4 Udo Riglewski #104 Match data Apr 24, 1991* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Gustafsson #681 #10 2,141 2,013 396 254 60.9% 0 0 0 2 12 14
Udo Riglewski #1,274 #82 394 1,657 43 79 35.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Udo Riglewski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1985 2–2 50.0% #204 1,537 0 0
19 1986 0–2 0.0% #273 1,479 0 0 1986 1–2 33.3% #371 1,531 0 0
20 1987 5–4 55.6% #53 1,585 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #338 1,533 0 0
21 1988 24–19 55.8% #51 1,710 0 0 1988 4–10 28.6% #93 1,502 0 0
22 1989 23–18 56.1% #34 1,807 0 0 1989 9–16 36.0% #142 1,532 0 0
23 1990 25–16 61.0% #31 1,840 0 0 1990 15–23 39.5% #88 1,611 0 0
24 1991 47–17 73.4% #12 1,948 0 3 1991 10–20 33.3% #170 1,586 0 0
25 1992 27–21 56.2% #47 1,778 0 4 1992 1–2 33.3% #369 1,589 0 0
26 1993 50–29 63.3% #14 1,892 0 5 1993 0–1 0.0% #578 1,578 0 0
27 1994 26–11 70.3% #33 1,859 0 7 1994 0–1 0.0% #1153 1,561 0 0
28 1995 11–11 50.0% #84 1,734 0 7 — — — — — — —
29 1996 37–17 68.5% #17 1,891 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1997 26–18 59.1% #37 1,829 0 10 — — — — — — —
31 1998 37–21 63.8% #32 1,874 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1999 22–18 55.0% #60 1,800 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 2000 17–14 54.8% #82 1,718 0 14 — — — — — — —
34 2001 19–18 51.4% #82 1,695 0 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Udo Riglewski
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1989 7 6 13 53.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1991 7 5 12 58.3% 36 8 44 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1992 6 7 13 46.2% 19 10 29 65.5% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 38 15 53 71.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1994 14 2 16 87.5% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 16 5 21 76.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 10 9 19 52.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 88 73 161 54.7% 198 109 307 64.5% 18 18 36 50.0% 92 54 146 63.0% — 10 25 35 28.6% 18 39 57 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 452/514 of Magnus Gustafsson's and 34/35 of Udo Riglewski's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Udo Riglewski
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 1991 56/64 1.9 2.8 68.4% 65.4% 51.7% 53.5% 49.8% 60.9% 44.8% 1991 29/30 3.5 2.0 61.2% 67.4% 46.1% 56.6% 39.7% 58.9% 35.8%
25 1992 45/48 1.8 2.8 67.5% 67.7% 47.9% 60.6% 39.4% 61.4% 40.9% 1992 3/3 2.0 3.7 48.2% 68.8% 36.7% 49.2% 61.4% 51.5% 39.4%
26 1993 71/79 1.7 2.3 70.1% 67.0% 49.8% 59.8% 43.1% 62.1% 41.6% 1993 1/1 7.0 9.0 58.0% 65.5% 45.2% 44.4% 14.3% 57.0% 36.4%
27 1994 33/37 1.8 4.2 64.6% 67.4% 52.9% 54.1% 49.3% 62.2% 46.2% 1994 1/1 4.0 2.0 55.9% 55.3% 33.3% 40.0% 50.0% 45.6% 39.0%
28 1995 20/22 2.4 3.9 62.4% 65.9% 48.8% 49.0% 54.4% 59.8% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 47/54 3.4 3.4 62.9% 68.9% 51.5% 54.5% 48.2% 62.6% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 40/44 4.1 4.8 62.2% 69.5% 48.5% 62.6% 45.2% 61.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 51/58 3.0 3.8 62.7% 71.8% 54.3% 60.3% 46.0% 65.4% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 34/40 4.0 4.1 62.6% 71.5% 49.7% 57.8% 47.5% 63.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 24/31 4.1 4.1 62.6% 70.0% 52.1% 62.9% 32.1% 63.1% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 31/37 3.4 3.5 61.6% 68.1% 46.7% 56.1% 43.0% 59.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 452/650 2.7 3.4 65.1% 68.4% 50.5% 57.7% 45.3% 62.2% 41.8% — 34/122 3.5 2.4 59.8% 67.1% 44.9% 55.1% 41.2% 57.8% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Gustafsson Udo Riglewski
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1537 116.0 — — — — — +28 — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.32
19 1986 1479 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.07 1986 1532 106.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.12 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 1987 1585 136.3 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.80 1987 1534 108.4 — — — — — +28 — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — -0.15
21 1988 1711 136.3 — — — — -69 -22 -159 57.0% +0.35 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 -0.55 1988 1502 110.6 — — — — +1 +31 — 40.0% -0.92 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 97.7 +0.39
22 1989 1808 142.7 — — — — -23 -102 — 53.2% -0.01 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 102.4 -1.65 1989 1533 131.1 — — — — +10 -9 — 39.7% -0.53 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 103.9 +0.10
23 1990 1840 149.5 — — — — -49 +14 — 55.6% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 10–10 (50%) 106.6 +0.25 1990 1612 128.6 — — — — +22 -69 — 43.6% -0.65 7–7 (50%) 10–7 (59%) 105.4 +0.06
24 1991 1949 159.0 +0.58 +5.54 1.147 52.8% -132 +89 — 63.8% +0.92 16–6 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 105.6 -3.91 1991 1586 127.0 -1.02 -2.59 0.872 47.3% +35 -53 — 35.2% -1.06 3–4 (43%) 5–10 (33%) 96.7 -2.04
25 1992 1779 142.7 +0.62 +1.82 1.059 51.0% -45 +128 — 53.3% +0.38 12–3 (80%) 5–6 (45%) 104.2 -0.22 1992 1589 110.7 -1.97 -1.31 0.813 45.5% — — — 33.3% -1.67 — 1–0 — -0.28
26 1993 1893 150.4 +1.06 +2.75 1.097 51.7% -102 +32 — 59.5% +0.62 15–10 (60%) 14–12 (54%) 101.9 +0.12 1993 1579 104.4 +1.76 +0.80 0.847 45.4% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
27 1994 1859 150.9 +1.06 +5.93 1.223 53.7% +38 +2 — 63.9% +1.13 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 100.0 -0.24 1994 1562 99.1 +1.49 -2.59 0.716 42.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.09
28 1995 1734 129.3 -0.71 +2.58 1.088 51.6% +88 +66 — 52.7% +0.38 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 92.1 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 1892 151.9 +0.89 +4.77 1.158 52.8% +3 -36 -192 63.8% +1.00 8–7 (53%) 14–12 (54%) 102.1 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1997 1830 140.1 +0.02 +2.59 1.074 51.1% +63 -24 -144 55.0% +0.47 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) 96.2 +1.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1998 1875 153.3 +3.32 +3.75 1.200 52.8% +18 -54 -154 58.3% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -3.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1999 1801 139.9 +1.18 -0.49 1.035 50.3% +85 -46 — 51.0% +0.04 11–7 (61%) 5–9 (36%) 97.1 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2000 1719 125.4 +0.22 -0.31 1.004 49.9% +111 +38 -59 55.8% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.7 +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2001 1695 134.2 -1.00 +1.31 0.973 49.5% +89 +43 -79 48.4% -0.09 8–6 (57%) 8–4 (67%) 103.8 -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2014 152.4 +0.85 +3.03 1.105 51.7% -4 +23 -128 57.1% +0.52 127–86 (60%) 103–100 (51%) 102.0 -1.50 — 1657 130.6 -0.95 -2.38 0.859 47.0% +22 -27 — 40.1% -0.75 18–27 (40%) 25–27 (48%) 100.0 -1.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.