H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Larsson vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 4-0
Magnus Larsson holds a 4–0 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1995 Stockholm third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 65
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1995* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 6-1 6-4 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Mar 12, 1994* | Zaragoza | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Magnus Larsson | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Jul 8, 1993* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Larsson | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1992* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Magnus Larsson | 6-4 7-6(5) | Anders Jarryd | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Anders Jarryd | #1,316 | #5 | 957 | 2,059 | 371 | 251 | 59.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Larsson | Anders Jarryd | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #182 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #58 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #6 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #8 | 1,982 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #19 | 1,883 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,957 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #32 | 1,820 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #73 | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,763 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #67 | 1,624 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #124 | 1,643 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #410 | 1,528 | 0 | 8 |