H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-1

Magnus Larsson holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–0 on clay, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1993 Stuttgart Open round of 64 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Larsson #60 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(7) Andrei Cherkasov #59 Match data Jul 21, 1993* R64 Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Magnus Larsson #57 6-3 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #14 Match data Jul 11, 1991* R32 Swedish Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andrei Cherkasov #31 6-4 6-1 Magnus Larsson #81 Match data Sep 27, 1990* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,034 295 218 57.5% 0 0 1 1 5 7
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,898 175 200 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–2 33.3% #236 1,510 0 0
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,578 0 0
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,879 0 1
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,719 0 1 1992 33–30 52.4% #32 1,731 0 2
22 1992 29–20 59.2% #34 1,808 0 3 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,756 0 2
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,826 0 3 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,556 0 2
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,007 0 6 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,537 0 2
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,930 0 6 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,465 0 2
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,758 0 6 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,486 0 2
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,904 0 6 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,463 0 2
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,842 0 6 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,482 0 2
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,750 0 6 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 2
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,766 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,726 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,672 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,688 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Larsson Andrei Cherkasov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
20 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4%
21 1991 6 5 11 54.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1992 12 9 21 57.1% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
22 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1993 13 14 27 48.1% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1994 6 10 16 37.5% 1 14 15 6.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 19 6 25 76.0% 1995 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1995 16 5 21 76.2% 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1996 12 13 25 48.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1997 20 11 31 64.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1998 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2000 11 3 14 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 89 203 56.2% 102 75 177 57.6% 24 19 43 55.8% 55 35 90 61.1% — 70 72 142 49.3% 66 76 142 46.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 39 43 82 47.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Larsson Andrei Cherkasov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1510 122.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.80 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
18 1988 1519 107.6 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.01 1989 1578 139.4 — — — — +40 -28 — 46.5% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 100.0 -0.78
19 1989 1469 100.1 — — — — — — — 22.2% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.36 1990 1880 155.5 — — — — -6 -147 — 55.8% +0.44 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 -2.83
20 1990 1680 130.3 — — — — -78 -2 — 58.1% +0.23 6–4 (60%) 7–3 (70%) 107.3 -0.17 1991 1816 151.6 +1.20 +2.36 1.078 51.3% +39 -37 — 53.3% +0.32 11–11 (50%) 15–16 (48%) 96.0 -1.80
21 1991 1719 139.2 — — — — -74 +15 — 49.1% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 9–4 (69%) 105.4 -0.78 1992 1731 148.3 +1.44 +0.70 1.031 50.3% +31 +97 — 51.2% +0.21 8–8 (50%) 17–20 (46%) 96.3 -2.86
22 1992 1808 144.9 — — — — -107 +18 -181 57.6% +0.31 14–8 (64%) 16–14 (53%) 106.6 -1.31 1993 1756 144.5 -1.63 +1.08 0.947 49.2% -1 +81 — 50.3% -0.11 13–9 (59%) 15–13 (54%) 102.9 -1.60
23 1993 1827 145.2 — — — — -22 -32 — 51.4% -0.04 14–4 (78%) 16–10 (62%) 109.7 -1.29 1994 1556 136.1 -5.31 +0.17 0.809 45.5% +135 +81 — 28.2% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 -2.62
24 1994 2007 155.2 — — — — +9 -209 -325 58.7% +0.71 13–7 (65%) 13–18 (42%) 101.6 -2.58 1995 1537 113.1 -0.55 +0.29 0.915 48.0% — +65 — 38.9% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 1995 1930 153.9 — — — — +61 -52 — 62.6% +0.74 11–5 (69%) 14–8 (64%) 106.6 -0.85 1996 1465 107.9 -4.37 -2.36 0.771 44.8% +137 +66 — 27.0% -1.49 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 97.5 +0.66
26 1996 1759 148.1 — — — — +63 +77 -34 52.5% +0.27 10–8 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.9 -1.55 1997 1487 119.3 -3.14 +0.50 0.908 48.4% +91 — — 34.3% -0.68 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +0.31
27 1997 1904 152.5 — — — — -19 -32 — 62.8% +0.76 12–9 (57%) 15–9 (63%) 103.1 -2.40 1998 1463 110.4 -1.88 +0.26 0.784 45.6% — — — 14.3% -1.57 0–1 — — -0.13
28 1998 1842 137.9 — — — — +17 -83 -40 55.6% +0.50 4–3 (57%) 3–9 (25%) 95.5 +0.22 1999 1483 121.3 -2.45 +1.83 1.021 50.6% +70 +29 — 48.1% +0.37 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.30
29 1999 1750 138.3 — — — — +66 -9 — 54.3% +0.41 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 93.7 -0.69 2000 1452 106.1 -1.13 -1.15 0.826 46.3% +59 — — 25.0% -0.88 — 0–1 — +0.05
30 2000 1767 122.0 — — — — +70 -44 — 59.1% +0.39 6–2 (75%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +1.21 2001 1437 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2001 1727 121.8 — — — — +39 +1 -3 48.3% -0.37 5–3 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1672 119.6 — — — — +85 — -15 53.7% +0.22 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) 97.7 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1688 120.0 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +77 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2035 150.2 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +6 -23 -93 55.7% +0.34 109–75 (59%) 129–102 (56%) 107.6 -2.04 — 1898 148.9 -1.01 +0.93 0.957 49.1% +42 +10 — 47.4% -0.09 52–63 (45%) 67–79 (46%) 93.0 -3.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.