H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 2-1

Magnus Larsson holds a 2–1 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–0 on clay, while Andrei Cherkasov leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1993 Stuttgart Outdoor second round 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(7).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Andrei Cherkasov
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 21, 1993* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R64 Clay Magnus Larsson #60 7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(7) Andrei Cherkasov #59 Match data
Jul 11, 1991* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Magnus Larsson #57 6-3 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #14 Match data
Sep 27, 1990* Basel ATP 250 R32 Hard Andrei Cherkasov #31 6-4 6-1 Magnus Larsson #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7 — — — — — — —
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7 — — — — — — —