H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Larsson vs Andres Gomez H2H: 1-0
Magnus Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Andres Gomez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1991 US Open first round 4-6 6-3 7-6(8) 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 66
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 4-6 6-3 7-6(8) 2-6 6-1 | Andres Gomez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Andres Gomez | #1,171 | #4 | 2,005 | 2,092 | 502 | 261 | 65.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Larsson | Andres Gomez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 51–25 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #5 | 2,072 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #10 | 1,898 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #11 | 1,913 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #24 | 1,808 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #17 | 1,868 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #6 | 1,726 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #70 | 1,722 | 1 | 21 |
| 32 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #179 | 1,676 | 1 | 21 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #402 | 1,606 | 1 | 21 |