H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-3

Magnus Larsson and Cedric Pioline are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #12 6-2 6-2 Magnus Larsson #36 Match data Apr 19, 2000* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Magnus Larsson #123 6-4 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #16 Match data Oct 14, 1999* R32 Vienna Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Cedric Pioline #30 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 Magnus Larsson #49 Match data Mar 15, 1997* R16 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Magnus Larsson #22 6-4 5-7 7-6(12) Cedric Pioline #35 Match data Nov 11, 1994* R16 Antwerp ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Magnus Larsson #40 6-2 6-4 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data Oct 8, 1994* QF Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Cedric Pioline #11 6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(2) Magnus Larsson #40 Match data Feb 17, 1994* R32 Stuttgart Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,034 295 218 57.5% 0 0 1 1 5 7
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,719 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 29–20 59.2% #34 1,808 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,826 0 3 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,007 0 6 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,930 0 6 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,758 0 6 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,904 0 6 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,842 0 6 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,750 0 6 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,766 0 7 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,726 0 7 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,672 0 7 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,688 0 7 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Larsson Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1991 6 5 11 54.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 19 6 25 76.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1995 16 5 21 76.2% 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1996 12 13 25 48.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1997 20 11 31 64.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 1998 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 2000 11 3 14 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 2002 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 114 89 203 56.2% 102 75 177 57.6% 24 19 43 55.8% 55 35 90 61.1% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 3/3 of Magnus Larsson's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Larsson Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 2003 3/3 8.0 4.0 69.7% 76.7% 37.8% 59.5% 38.2% 65.1% 43.5% 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 3/513 8.0 4.0 69.7% 76.7% 37.8% 59.5% 38.2% 65.1% 43.5% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Larsson Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1519 107.6 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1469 100.1 — — — — — — — 22.2% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1680 130.3 — — — — -78 -2 — 58.1% +0.23 6–4 (60%) 7–3 (70%) 107.3 -0.17 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1991 1719 139.2 — — — — -74 +15 — 49.1% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 9–4 (69%) 105.4 -0.78 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1992 1808 144.9 — — — — -107 +18 -181 57.6% +0.31 14–8 (64%) 16–14 (53%) 106.6 -1.31 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1993 1827 145.2 — — — — -22 -32 — 51.4% -0.04 14–4 (78%) 16–10 (62%) 109.7 -1.29 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1994 2007 155.2 — — — — +9 -209 -325 58.7% +0.71 13–7 (65%) 13–18 (42%) 101.6 -2.58 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1995 1930 153.9 — — — — +61 -52 — 62.6% +0.74 11–5 (69%) 14–8 (64%) 106.6 -0.85 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1996 1759 148.1 — — — — +63 +77 -34 52.5% +0.27 10–8 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.9 -1.55 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 1997 1904 152.5 — — — — -19 -32 — 62.8% +0.76 12–9 (57%) 15–9 (63%) 103.1 -2.40 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 1998 1842 137.9 — — — — +17 -83 -40 55.6% +0.50 4–3 (57%) 3–9 (25%) 95.5 +0.22 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 1999 1750 138.3 — — — — +66 -9 — 54.3% +0.41 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 93.7 -0.69 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 2000 1767 122.0 — — — — +70 -44 — 59.1% +0.39 6–2 (75%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +1.21 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 2001 1727 121.8 — — — — +39 +1 -3 48.3% -0.37 5–3 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 -0.73 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 2002 1672 119.6 — — — — +85 — -15 53.7% +0.22 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) 97.7 +0.59 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 2003 1688 120.0 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +77 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.26 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 2035 150.2 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +6 -23 -93 55.7% +0.34 109–75 (59%) 129–102 (56%) 107.6 -2.04 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.