H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 3-3

Magnus Larsson and Cedric Pioline are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-2.

SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 19, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #12 6-2 6-2 Magnus Larsson #36 Match data
Oct 14, 1999* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Larsson #123 6-4 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Mar 15, 1997* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #30 6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 Magnus Larsson #49 Match data
Nov 11, 1994* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Carpet Magnus Larsson #22 6-4 5-7 7-6(12) Cedric Pioline #35 Match data
Oct 8, 1994* Toulouse ATP 250 QF Hard Magnus Larsson #40 6-2 6-4 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Feb 17, 1994* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #11 6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(2) Magnus Larsson #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5