H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs David Rikl H2H: 1-1

Magnus Larsson and David Rikl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on clay, while David Rikl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1994 Australian Open first round 1-6 7-6(4) 6-3 6-0.

SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
CZE Age 55 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard David Rikl #59 1-6 7-6(4) 6-3 6-0 Magnus Larsson #38 Match data
Apr 24, 1991* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Magnus Larsson #53 6-3 6-1 David Rikl #201 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7
David Rikl #852 #41 809 1,685 53 92 36.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson David Rikl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #400 1,503 0 0
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #313 1,491 0 0
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1991 1–3 25.0% #163 1,474 0 0
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1 1992 5–7 41.7% #151 1,502 0 0
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3 1993 7–13 35.0% #95 1,530 0 0
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3 1994 19–28 40.4% #80 1,534 0 0
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6 1995 7–13 35.0% #83 1,533 0 0
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6 1996 10–21 32.3% #150 1,528 0 0
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6 1997 3–4 42.9% #173 1,578 0 0
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6 1999 0–1 0.0% #868 1,565 0 0
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7