H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Larsson vs Henri Leconte H2H: 2-1
Magnus Larsson holds a 2–1 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on carpet, while Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Leconte won the 1994 Milan third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1994* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Henri Leconte | 6-4 6-1 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1992* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Magnus Larsson | 6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-2 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1990* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 7-6 2-6 6-3 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Larsson | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |