H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 3-3

Magnus Larsson and Hicham Arazi are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–1 on clay, while Hicham Arazi leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 2001 Roland Garros second round 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3 6-4.

SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 1, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Magnus Larsson #493 6-4 3-6 2-6 6-3 6-4 Hicham Arazi #27 Match data
Jun 28, 1998* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Magnus Larsson #37 6-3 6-3 6-2 Hicham Arazi #59 Match data
Jun 1, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Hicham Arazi #55 6-2 6-3 7-5 Magnus Larsson #39 Match data
Apr 23, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Magnus Larsson #43 6-3 6-3 Hicham Arazi #56 Match data
Jan 4, 1997* Doha ATP 250 QF Hard Hicham Arazi #79 7-6(3) 7-6(2) Magnus Larsson #46 Match data
Aug 22, 1996* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard Hicham Arazi #82 6-3 2-6 6-4 Magnus Larsson #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 213 48.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3 1996 12–16 42.9% #79 1,550 0 0
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,714 0 1
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7 2004 15–17 46.9% #62 1,711 0 1
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,672 0 1
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7