H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 2-0

Magnus Larsson holds a 2–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1996 Qatar Open round of 16 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Larsson #17 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 Jeff Tarango #76 Match data Jan 5, 1996* R16 Qatar Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Magnus Larsson #46 6-2 6-4 6-3 Jeff Tarango #85 Match data May 27, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,034 295 218 57.5% 0 0 1 1 5 7
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,788 240 294 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,719 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,607 0 0
22 1992 29–20 59.2% #34 1,808 0 3 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,613 0 0
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,826 0 3 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,007 0 6 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,930 0 6 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,655 0 2
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,758 0 6 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,654 0 2
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,904 0 6 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,619 0 2
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,842 0 6 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,693 0 2
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,750 0 6 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,766 0 7 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,726 0 7 2000 11–25 30.6% #112 1,517 0 2
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,672 0 7 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,688 0 7 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,447 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Larsson Jeff Tarango
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 6 5 11 54.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1991 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1992 17 11 28 60.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 19 6 25 76.0% 1993 14 16 30 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1995 16 5 21 76.2% 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1996 12 13 25 48.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1997 20 11 31 64.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
28 1998 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1997 20 13 33 60.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
29 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 19 18 37 51.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2000 11 3 14 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 6 11 17 35.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
31 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 2 14 16 12.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2002 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2001 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 89 203 56.2% 102 75 177 57.6% 24 19 43 55.8% 55 35 90 61.1% — 146 167 313 46.6% 49 59 108 45.4% 14 27 41 34.1% 31 41 72 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Larsson Jeff Tarango
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1519 107.6 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.01 1987 1508 108.5 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.19
19 1989 1469 100.1 — — — — — — — 22.2% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.36 1988 1598 124.9 — — — — +37 — — 51.4% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) — -0.05
20 1990 1680 130.3 — — — — -78 -2 — 58.1% +0.23 6–4 (60%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.17 1989 1648 118.8 — — — — +7 — -102 46.4% -0.39 3–2 (60%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
21 1991 1719 139.2 — — — — -74 +15 — 49.1% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 9–4 (69%) — -0.78 1990 1607 120.5 — — — — +6 -46 -69 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.35
22 1992 1808 144.9 — — — — -107 +18 -181 57.6% +0.31 14–8 (64%) 16–14 (53%) — -1.31 1991 1613 132.3 -1.93 -1.26 0.892 48.2% +24 -37 — 41.8% -0.47 8–7 (53%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.07
23 1993 1827 145.2 — — — — -22 -32 — 51.4% -0.04 14–4 (78%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.29 1992 1694 139.2 -0.84 +0.16 0.974 49.7% +28 -96 -139 50.4% +0.10 15–6 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.21
24 1994 2007 155.2 — — — — +9 -209 -325 58.7% +0.71 13–7 (65%) 13–18 (42%) — -2.58 1993 1670 136.1 -1.01 -0.06 0.942 49.0% +18 -8 — 45.9% -0.28 12–6 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.60
25 1995 1930 153.9 — — — — +61 -52 — 62.6% +0.74 11–5 (69%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.85 1994 1655 132.9 -1.13 +0.92 0.992 50.0% +24 -22 — 46.1% -0.03 6–7 (46%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.47
26 1996 1759 148.1 — — — — +63 +77 -34 52.5% +0.27 10–8 (56%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.55 1995 1654 144.2 +0.56 -0.03 0.982 49.5% +7 -14 -104 43.3% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34
27 1997 1904 152.5 — — — — -19 -32 — 62.8% +0.76 12–9 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -2.40 1996 1620 125.4 -0.16 +0.21 0.984 49.7% +74 -59 — 44.4% -0.35 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.93
28 1998 1842 137.9 — — — — +17 -83 -40 55.6% +0.50 4–3 (57%) 3–9 (25%) — +0.22 1997 1694 143.8 +0.74 +1.18 1.031 50.6% +30 -59 -135 52.9% +0.29 7–11 (39%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.45
29 1999 1750 138.3 — — — — +66 -9 — 54.3% +0.41 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.69 1998 1660 141.3 -0.44 +2.15 1.031 50.5% +49 -71 -90 47.8% -0.04 7–14 (33%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.03
30 2000 1767 122.0 — — — — +70 -44 — 59.1% +0.39 6–2 (75%) 6–2 (75%) — +1.21 1999 1685 132.2 -2.40 -0.03 0.934 48.9% +15 -75 -110 46.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.16
31 2001 1727 121.8 — — — — +39 +1 -3 48.3% -0.37 5–3 (63%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.73 2000 1517 123.9 -0.88 -1.79 0.903 48.4% -8 +82 +47 38.3% -0.57 3–10 (23%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.28
32 2002 1672 119.6 — — — — +85 — -15 53.7% +0.22 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.59 2001 1453 110.6 -0.42 -1.74 0.824 46.7% +20 — — 25.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01
33 2003 1688 120.0 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +77 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.26 2002 1447 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1455 101.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2035 150.2 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +6 -23 -93 55.7% +0.34 109–75 (59%) 129–102 (56%) 107.6 -2.04 — 1788 140.0 -0.70 +0.24 0.968 49.5% +26 -27 -95 45.8% -0.19 84–94 (47%) 79–102 (44%) 95.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.