H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Magnus Larsson vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-0
Magnus Larsson holds a 1–0 lead over Michiel Schapers in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1991 Rotterdam third round 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1991* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Magnus Larsson | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Larsson | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |