H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Magnus Larsson vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 2-0
Magnus Larsson holds a 2–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Larsson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1996 Dubai third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1996* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 6-2 6-4 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 6-2 7-5 6-3 | Renzo Furlan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Renzo Furlan | #1,479 | #19 | 1,235 | 1,844 | 209 | 231 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Larsson | Renzo Furlan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #222 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #77 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #41 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 37–31 | 54.4% | #29 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #40 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #144 | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #225 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #236 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,540 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #194 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |