H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 2-2

Magnus Larsson and Stefan Edberg are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1995 Doha final 7-6(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 1995* Doha ATP 250 F Hard Stefan Edberg #7 7-6(4) 6-1 Magnus Larsson #19 Match data
Dec 10, 1994* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Magnus Larsson #19 6-4 6-7 8-6 Stefan Edberg #7 Match data
Feb 20, 1992* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R32 Carpet Stefan Edberg #2 6-2 6-2 Magnus Larsson #81 Match data
Apr 25, 1991* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Magnus Larsson #53 5-7 6-3 7-6(3) Stefan Edberg #1 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,233 744 246 75.2% 6 5 1 0 29 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Stefan Edberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,823 0 1
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,129 1 5
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,121 1 8
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,206 2 15
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3 1988 54–15 78.3% #5 2,080 3 18
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,149 3 20
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,172 4 27
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,146 5 33
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6 1992 64–19 77.1% #2 2,044 6 36
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,854 6 40
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,823 6 41
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,890 6 41
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7 — — — — — — —