H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Thomas Muster H2H: 3-3

Magnus Larsson and Thomas Muster are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 3–0 on clay, while Magnus Larsson leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1998 Halle third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 1998* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Magnus Larsson #51 6-3 6-2 Thomas Muster #20 Match data
Apr 16, 1995* Barcelona ATP 250 F Clay Thomas Muster #17 6-2 6-1 6-4 Magnus Larsson #12 Match data
Feb 24, 1995* Stuttgart Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Magnus Larsson #15 7-5 5-7 6-4 Thomas Muster #18 Match data
Nov 3, 1994* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Magnus Larsson #23 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 7-5 Thomas Muster #15 Match data
Apr 24, 1993* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #12 6-2 3-6 6-0 Magnus Larsson #32 Match data
Aug 10, 1991* Prague ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #59 6-3 6-0 Magnus Larsson #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,040 293 217 57.5% 0 0 1 0 6 7
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,718 0 1 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1992 27–19 58.7% #34 1,802 0 3 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,820 0 3 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,004 0 6 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,932 0 6 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,765 0 6 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,891 0 6 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,828 0 6 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,729 0 6 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,770 0 7 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,728 0 7 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,673 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,689 0 7 — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44