H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Magnus Larsson vs Tom Nijssen H2H: 1-1

Magnus Larsson and Tom Nijssen are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1992 Antwerp round of 16 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Larsson
SWE Age 56 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tom Nijssen
NED Age 61 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Larsson #36 4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(2) Tom Nijssen #278 Match data Nov 13, 1992* R16 Antwerp ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Tom Nijssen #293 7-6(6) 6-2 Magnus Larsson #57 Match data Nov 8, 1991* R16 Birmingham ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Larsson #1,422 #10 2,222 2,034 295 218 57.5% 0 0 1 1 5 7
Tom Nijssen #827 #87 242 1,678 39 76 33.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Larsson Tom Nijssen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1988 2–2 50.0% #381 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1989 0–3 0.0% #145 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1990 15–9 62.5% #56 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1991 21–21 50.0% #61 1,719 0 1 1986 0–3 0.0% #396 1,476 0 0
22 1992 29–20 59.2% #34 1,808 0 3 1987 7–9 43.8% #103 1,537 0 0
23 1993 29–25 53.7% #39 1,826 0 3 1988 6–13 31.6% #114 1,545 0 0
24 1994 36–21 63.2% #19 2,007 0 6 1989 12–15 44.4% #99 1,634 0 0
25 1995 32–13 71.1% #17 1,930 0 6 1990 3–13 18.8% #194 1,538 0 0
26 1996 26–23 53.1% #46 1,758 0 6 1991 3–5 37.5% #253 1,570 0 0
27 1997 38–21 64.4% #25 1,904 0 6 1992 4–6 40.0% #221 1,601 0 0
28 1998 19–16 54.3% #43 1,842 0 6 1993 4–7 36.4% #235 1,625 0 0
29 1999 16–18 47.1% #95 1,750 0 6 1994 0–4 0.0% #591 1,561 0 0
30 2000 13–6 68.4% #75 1,766 0 7 1995 0–1 0.0% #793 1,554 0 0
31 2001 10–10 50.0% #136 1,726 0 7 — — — — — — —
32 2002 8–8 50.0% #152 1,672 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2003 1–2 33.3% #507 1,688 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Larsson Tom Nijssen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 6 5 11 54.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 17 8 25 68.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 19 6 25 76.0% 1989 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 1995 16 5 21 76.2% 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1996 12 13 25 48.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1997 20 11 31 64.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 1998 12 9 21 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2000 11 3 14 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 89 203 56.2% 102 75 177 57.6% 24 19 43 55.8% 55 35 90 61.1% — 12 22 34 35.3% 12 25 37 32.4% 1 7 8 12.5% 14 22 36 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Larsson Tom Nijssen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1988 1519 107.6 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 1469 100.1 — — — — — — — 22.2% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 1680 130.3 — — — — -78 -2 — 58.1% +0.23 6–4 (60%) 7–3 (70%) 107.3 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 1719 139.2 — — — — -74 +15 — 49.1% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 9–4 (69%) 105.4 -0.78 1986 1476 105.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.18
22 1992 1808 144.9 — — — — -107 +18 -181 57.6% +0.31 14–8 (64%) 16–14 (53%) 106.6 -1.31 1987 1538 116.4 — — — — -6 +19 — 40.5% -1.00 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.55
23 1993 1827 145.2 — — — — -22 -32 — 51.4% -0.04 14–4 (78%) 16–10 (62%) 109.7 -1.29 1988 1545 122.1 — — — — -25 +50 — 34.0% -0.84 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -0.07
24 1994 2007 155.2 — — — — +9 -209 -325 58.7% +0.71 13–7 (65%) 13–18 (42%) 101.6 -2.58 1989 1634 128.9 — — — — +42 -95 -104 44.6% -0.28 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 96.5 +0.06
25 1995 1930 153.9 — — — — +61 -52 — 62.6% +0.74 11–5 (69%) 14–8 (64%) 106.6 -0.85 1990 1539 117.4 — — — — +60 — — 22.9% -1.91 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 97.4 -0.78
26 1996 1759 148.1 — — — — +63 +77 -34 52.5% +0.27 10–8 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 100.9 -1.55 1991 1570 126.0 -0.77 -0.23 0.839 47.2% +46 — — 45.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 -0.44
27 1997 1904 152.5 — — — — -19 -32 — 62.8% +0.76 12–9 (57%) 15–9 (63%) 103.1 -2.40 1992 1602 126.0 +0.80 +0.57 1.071 51.5% +22 -37 — 48.0% -0.16 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -0.47
28 1998 1842 137.9 — — — — +17 -83 -40 55.6% +0.50 4–3 (57%) 3–9 (25%) 95.5 +0.22 1993 1625 123.0 -1.24 -2.23 0.799 46.3% +2 -52 — 33.3% -1.11 4–1 (80%) 1–3 (25%) 102.5 -1.02
29 1999 1750 138.3 — — — — +66 -9 — 54.3% +0.41 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 93.7 -0.69 1994 1562 102.7 -3.16 +0.27 0.830 46.9% — -31 — 27.3% -1.55 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.07
30 2000 1767 122.0 — — — — +70 -44 — 59.1% +0.39 6–2 (75%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +1.21 1995 1555 107.4 -2.36 +0.67 0.776 45.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.16
31 2001 1727 121.8 — — — — +39 +1 -3 48.3% -0.37 5–3 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2002 1672 119.6 — — — — +85 — -15 53.7% +0.22 2–5 (29%) 7–5 (58%) 97.7 +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2003 1688 120.0 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +77 — — 50.0% 0.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2035 150.2 +2.15 +1.76 1.246 54.2% +6 -23 -93 55.7% +0.34 109–75 (59%) 129–102 (56%) 107.6 -2.04 — 1678 131.2 -0.76 -0.63 0.886 48.1% +25 -13 -104 37.0% -0.86 16–22 (42%) 14–26 (35%) 95.2 -2.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.