H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 1-0
Magnus Norman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2000 Shanghai third round 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 52
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2000* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | Andrea Gaudenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | #1,441 | #18 | 1,522 | 1,865 | 204 | 220 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Andrea Gaudenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #861 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #632 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #60 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #24 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #57 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #84 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #54 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 11–26 | 29.7% | #120 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #293 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |