H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 1-0

Magnus Norman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2000 Shanghai Masters round of 32 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magnus Norman #4 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 Andrea Gaudenzi #98 Match data Oct 19, 2000* R32 Shanghai Masters ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 236 164 59.0% 0 1 0 1 10 12
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,543 0 0 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,673 0 0 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,825 0 1 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0
24 2000 66–24 73.3% #4 1,862 0 12 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,746 0 12 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,672 0 12 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,594 0 12 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magnus Norman Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1995 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 20 7 27 74.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1998 6 13 19 31.6% 13 10 23 56.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1999 22 10 32 68.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 39 16 55 70.9% 26 6 32 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 2001 18 11 29 62.1% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 112 82 194 57.7% 103 61 164 62.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 14 13 27 51.9% — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 345/400 of Magnus Norman's and 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magnus Norman Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 1992 1/1 2.0 5.0 46.5% 50.0% 43.5% 50.0% — 46.5% 27.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3%
19 1995 5/5 2.0 1.0 58.3% 66.1% 42.1% 45.9% 61.6% 56.6% 44.5% 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7%
20 1996 21/23 6.2 2.0 60.3% 72.6% 52.3% 59.5% 51.1% 64.1% 38.6% 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8%
21 1997 62/68 8.9 3.2 52.5% 73.7% 50.1% 66.5% 40.4% 62.3% 37.7% 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8%
22 1998 44/52 6.8 3.5 50.7% 70.4% 47.7% 60.2% 37.2% 59.0% 36.6% 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9%
23 1999 58/64 4.6 2.4 56.9% 74.3% 53.1% 64.1% 44.8% 65.3% 42.0% 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3%
24 2000 72/90 6.6 2.2 62.8% 74.1% 53.1% 60.4% 45.8% 66.2% 42.0% 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5%
25 2001 36/40 5.5 2.1 59.7% 69.7% 50.6% 58.4% 49.5% 61.9% 40.1% 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4%
26 2002 20/31 5.4 1.9 60.0% 66.6% 53.4% 55.4% 46.7% 61.7% 37.4% 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1%
27 2003 26/26 5.0 2.8 54.7% 72.4% 48.4% 51.6% 42.4% 61.0% 34.8% 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8%
Career — 345/400 6.3 2.6 57.0% 72.3% 51.0% 60.6% 44.2% 63.0% 39.3% — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magnus Norman Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1992 1489 97.1 -2.65 -0.49 0.510 36.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.12 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18
19 1995 1543 116.2 -0.81 +1.84 1.024 50.4% — +44 — 60.0% +0.60 — — — -0.23 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) 109.1 +0.33
20 1996 1673 132.2 +1.15 +0.51 1.073 51.5% -81 -5 — 54.2% +0.17 6–4 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 106.7 +0.42 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) 108.9 -2.78
21 1997 1826 144.4 +0.12 +0.66 1.000 50.4% -71 +28 -150 57.8% +0.31 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 110.1 -2.25 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 101.1 +0.04
22 1998 1720 134.9 -2.02 -0.53 0.893 48.2% -36 +101 -63 43.7% -0.53 10–6 (63%) 13–11 (54%) 103.8 -1.55 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) 98.5 +0.03
23 1999 1890 143.4 +3.19 +3.30 1.209 53.2% -71 +6 -255 63.9% +1.14 9–8 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 98.8 +0.39 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 -1.16
24 2000 1863 155.8 +4.09 +4.23 1.245 53.7% -12 +197 — 68.3% +1.04 15–11 (58%) 19–14 (58%) 98.2 +0.50 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) 106.9 +1.21
25 2001 1747 136.1 -0.01 +1.60 1.054 51.1% +59 +154 — 57.1% +0.21 6–5 (55%) 10–8 (56%) 97.1 +1.62 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 101.5 +0.59
26 2002 1672 129.6 -0.57 -0.27 0.977 49.8% +62 +78 — 40.6% -0.62 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 94.2 -0.34 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) 93.4 +0.05
27 2003 1595 121.7 -0.64 -1.88 0.892 48.0% +92 +37 — 40.7% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 7–3 (70%) 102.0 +0.28 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) 103.8 -2.07
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) 96.5 -0.26
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55
Career — 2041 146.5 +1.12 +1.55 1.063 51.2% -17 +80 -164 56.7% +0.36 65–54 (55%) 83–69 (55%) 103.9 -0.26 — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.