H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Christian Ruud H2H: 3-0
Magnus Norman holds a 3–0 lead over Christian Ruud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magnus Norman leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2000 Stockholm third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
NOR
Age 53
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2000* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 6-1 6-2 | Christian Ruud | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1998* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Christian Ruud | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1997* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-3 7-6(6) | Christian Ruud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Christian Ruud | #662 | #39 | 1,006 | 1,768 | 98 | 128 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Christian Ruud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #84 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #75 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #59 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #65 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #86 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |