H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 4-2

Magnus Norman holds a 4–2 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Magnus Norman leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-2 5-7 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Fabrice Santoro #26 6-2 5-7 3-6 6-4 6-4 Magnus Norman #161 Match data
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Magnus Norman #4 7-6(6) 6-3 6-0 Fabrice Santoro #47 Match data
Nov 16, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Fabrice Santoro #37 6-2 6-4 Magnus Norman #4 Match data
Jun 2, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Magnus Norman #3 6-1 6-4 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #29 Match data
Jun 25, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Magnus Norman #60 6-2 6-3 7-6(5) Fabrice Santoro #43 Match data
Jan 14, 1999* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Norman #51 4-6 7-6(7) 3-0 (ret.) Fabrice Santoro #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6