H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 3-3

Magnus Norman and Jeff Tarango are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jeff Tarango leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Magnus Norman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 2001 Dubai third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magnus Norman
SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 1, 2001* Dubai ATP 250 R32 Hard Magnus Norman #5 6-4 6-4 Jeff Tarango #113 Match data
Aug 1, 1999* Umag ATP 250 F Clay Magnus Norman #30 6-2 6-4 Jeff Tarango #79 Match data
Mar 18, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeff Tarango #61 7-5 6-0 Magnus Norman #23 Match data
Feb 20, 1998* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeff Tarango #65 7-6(2) 6-2 Magnus Norman #24 Match data
Jul 12, 1997* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay Magnus Norman #32 6-2 6-3 Jeff Tarango #71 Match data
Apr 25, 1996* Seoul ATP 250 R32 Hard Jeff Tarango #83 7-6(0) 6-4 Magnus Norman #115 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2