H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 0-1
Jonathan Stark holds a 1–0 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonathan Stark won the 1996 New Delhi third round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1996* | New Delhi | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jonathan Stark | 6-1 7-6(4) | Magnus Norman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |