H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-2
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 2–1 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2002 Hong Kong third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2002* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-3 6-4 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2002* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-3 6-2 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |