H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Leander Paes H2H: 2-0
Magnus Norman holds a 2–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magnus Norman won the 1997 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Magnus Norman | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Leander Paes | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1997* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Leander Paes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |