H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Magnus Norman vs Lleyton Hewitt H2H: 2-3

Lleyton Hewitt holds a 3–2 lead over Magnus Norman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lleyton Hewitt leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lleyton Hewitt won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-1.

SWE Age 50 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #5 6-4 6-1 Magnus Norman #23 Match data
Jan 14, 2001* Sydney ATP 250 F Hard Lleyton Hewitt #7 6-4 6-1 Magnus Norman #4 Match data
May 14, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Magnus Norman #4 6-3 6-0 Lleyton Hewitt #12 Match data
Jan 26, 2000* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Magnus Norman #11 6-3 6-1 7-6(6) Lleyton Hewitt #17 Match data
Mar 4, 1999* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Lleyton Hewitt #91 6-3 7-5 Magnus Norman #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magnus Norman #500 #2 3,610 2,041 234 163 58.9% 0 1 0 0 11 12
Lleyton Hewitt #636 #1 5,205 2,159 564 241 70.1% 2 2 2 1 23 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magnus Norman Lleyton Hewitt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1992 0–1 0.0% #690 1,489 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #550 1,492 0 0
17 1998 10–9 52.6% #100 1,614 0 1
18 1999 40–18 69.0% #25 1,853 0 2
19 1995 3–2 60.0% #170 1,542 0 0 2000 53–15 77.9% #7 1,993 0 6
20 1996 13–10 56.5% #86 1,672 0 0 2001 71–15 82.6% #1 2,116 1 12
21 1997 42–26 61.8% #22 1,822 0 1 2002 61–16 79.2% #1 2,062 2 17
22 1998 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 2 2003 29–10 74.4% #17 1,939 2 19
23 1999 43–21 67.2% #15 1,890 0 7 2004 64–16 80.0% #3 2,076 2 23
24 2000 64–23 73.6% #4 1,885 0 12 2005 36–9 80.0% #4 2,092 2 24
25 2001 23–17 57.5% #49 1,751 0 12 2006 32–14 69.6% #20 1,964 2 25
26 2002 12–19 38.7% #107 1,673 0 12 2007 34–15 69.4% #21 1,925 2 26
27 2003 10–16 38.5% #125 1,595 0 12 2008 17–10 63.0% #67 1,936 2 26
28 2009 33–19 63.5% #22 1,956 2 27
29 2010 18–11 62.1% #54 1,907 2 28
30 2011 8–9 47.1% #186 1,817 2 28
31 2012 13–11 54.2% #83 1,867 2 28
32 2013 22–18 55.0% #60 1,884 2 28
33 2014 19–15 55.9% #50 1,841 2 30
34 2015 3–9 25.0% #307 1,715 2 30
35 2016 1–1 50.0% #633 1,727 2 30