H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Magnus Norman vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 1-1
Magnus Norman and Mark Philippoussis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on clay, while Magnus Norman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 50
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1998* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mark Philippoussis | 6-4 6-3 | Magnus Norman | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1997* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Norman | 6-4 7-5 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Norman | #500 | #2 | 3,610 | 2,041 | 234 | 163 | 58.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Norman | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #690 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1997 | 42–26 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1998 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1999 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #15 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2000 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #4 | 1,885 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2001 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #49 | 1,751 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2002 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,673 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |